<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Bilski case for October</title>
		<link>http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/forum/t-91486/bilski-case-for-october</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Bilski case for October&quot; - The Patently-O blog mentions that the judgment on the Bilski case will be published in October. Chief Judge Michel said: &quot;I think it will be a very significant decision. It probably will have broader scope than either In re Comiskey or In re Nuijten&quot;.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/forum/t-91486#post-266242</guid>
				<title>Bilski case for October</title>
				<link>http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/forum/t-91486/bilski-case-for-october#post-266242</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>zoobab</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2946</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The Patently-O blog <a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/09/patently-o-bi-1.html">mentions</a> that the judgment on the Bilski case will be published in October. Chief Judge Michel said:</p> <blockquote> <p>I think it will be a very significant decision. It probably will have broader scope than either In re Comiskey or In re Nuijten.</p> </blockquote> <p>I doubt that the judges will kick software patents out, even if Judge Plager <a href="http://www.researchoninnovation.org/WordPress/?p=103">mentioned</a> his regrets:</p> <blockquote> <p>Plager said he regretted the unintended consequences of the decisions in State Street Bank and AT&amp;T. Those rulings led to a flood of applications for software and business method patents, he noted. If we “rethink the breadth of patentable subject matter,” he said, <strong>we should ask whether these categories should be excluded from patent protection</strong>.</p> </blockquote> <p>United States law on patentability does not need to be stretched:</p> <blockquote> <p>Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or <strong>composition of matter</strong>, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent. (35 U.S.C. § 101)</p> </blockquote> <p>Some patent lawyers will of course argue that software is a process (data processing), but I doubt it will be enough to convince all the judges.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>