McCain advised by software patent & tobacco lobbyists?
Forum » News / Blog » McCain advised by software patent & tobacco lobbyists?
started by: zoobabzoobab
on: 1220544921|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 4
rss icon RSS: new posts
summary:
McCain is advised by pro-software patent lobbyist Ray Gifford, ex-President of the Progress & Freedom Foundation (a Washington 'think-tank' notably financed by Microsoft lobby proxy CompTIA). Gifford was speaking in a conference Europe about the failed software patent directive with all the pro-software patent lobbyists. Progress & Freedom Foundation runs the IPCentral blog.
McCain advised by software patent and tobacco lobbyists?
zoobabzoobab 1220544922|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

McCain is said to be advised by pro-software patent lobbyists. Ray Gifford, ex-President of the Progress & Freedom Foundation (a Washington 'think-tank' notably financed by Microsoft lobby proxy CompTIA), was speaking in a conference in Prague in February 2006 (see IP-Watch article "Industry Readies For Round Two Of EU Patent Directive") about the failed software patent directive with all the pro-software patent lobbyists (SAP's patent attorney, ACT, CompTIA, Microsoft, Siemens, etc…):

Slide_0006_Full.jpg

Microsoft’s McGibbon said EU Internal Market Commissioner Charlie McCreevy sees the patent directive as “fundamental” to Europe’s productivity and competitiveness. Later, PFF President Ray Gifford said fear of lost competitiveness is an effective argument with policy makers. Schmalz also raised the spectre of Asian software developers taking jobs from Europeans if measures are not taken to improve the European patent system.

Progress & Freedom Foundation runs the IPCentral blog, which supporting CompTIA's lobbying and even treating them as 'friends':

I wish the best of luck to Lueders and our other European friends as this battle continues.

It is not surprising, since PFF is financed by CompTIA (according to Wikipedia PFF's page and Archive.org):

Supporters of the of The Progress & Freedom Foundation include -

AT&T
CBS Corporation
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Clear Channel Communications
Comcast Corporation
CompTIA
CTIA – The Wireless Association
Computer & Communications Industry Association
DIRECTV
EMI Group
Entertainment Software Association
Google Inc.
Intel Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Microsoft
Motorola
National Cable & Telecommunications Association

According to the Sourcewatch's article, PFF seems also to be paid by Microsoft to write anti-open source articles, here is an extract of "The Enigma of Open Source Software" written by James DeLong:

In my opinion, open source looks like an idiosyncratic quirk that piggybacks on the billions of dollars that were spent on Unix rather than as a product of a real economic model. My view is that the open source advocates are pushing hard for preferences precisely because they doubt the sustainability of their model, and think that legal favoritism is necessary to keep it alive.

James DeLong was also present at the Prague conference with other pro-software patent lobbyists:

Despite SAP’s call for a bridge, some meeting participants fed distrust of the directive’s opponents. PFF’s James DeLong asked how the opposition got its funding, and whether it came from foundations. Schmalz replied that it came from open-source software companies. Speaking to the like-minded business audience, Schmalz also said that some industry representatives reported being personally threatened during the debates last summer.

last edited on 1221320893|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by arebenti + show more
unfold McCain advised by software patent and tobacco lobbyists? by zoobabzoobab, 1220544922|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: McCain advised by software patent and tobacco lobbyists?
arebentiarebenti 1220550939|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

So Mr. Ray L. Gifford was the president of PFF? The point is not that McCain is advised by pro-software patent advocates, industry has different opinions, but by those people behind PFF.

They talk about "free markets" but have no clue about the underlying reasoning. They caricature the way globalisation critics depict capitalism. PFF even used Hayek to advocate for software patents. Hayek is the most fierce critic of patent law.

"The problem of the prevention of monopoly and the prevention of competition is raised much more acutely in certain other fields to which the concept of property has been extended only in recent times. I am thinking here of the extension of the concept of property to such rights and privileges as patents for inventions, copyright, trademarks, and the like. It seems to me beyond doubt that in these fields a slavish application of the concept of property as it has been developed for material things has done a great deal to foster the growth of monopoly and that here drastic reforms may be required if competition is to be made to work…. Patents, in particular, are specially interesting from our point of view because they provide so clear an illustration of how it is necessary in all such instances not to apply a ready-made formula but to go back to the rationale of the market system and to decide for each class what the precise rights are to be which the government ought to protect."
Source: F. A. von Hayek, "'Free' Enterprise and Competitive Order". In Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: U. of Chicago Press. 1948. 113-114.

PFF was always just property religion and did not adapt very well to the European discourse. We found them an insult on an educated debate that American companies sent these foreigners1 to Europe to lobby for software patents. How can a presidential candidate as John McCain hire Tobacco for defining its IT policies? What is broken in Washington and why does the American public let them go away with it?

A few month ago John McCain expelled some DCI lobbyists from his campaign team with a new policy. DCI did not only lobby for software patents in Europe but for the Burmese government in Washington. It didn't suit the candidate well.

last edited on 1220556025|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by arebenti + show more
Re: McCain advised by software patent and tobacco lobbyists?
zoobabzoobab 1220553813|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

In Europe DCI runs a network of think tanks and it took responsibility for the weird journo-lobbying website TechCentralStation that spread hate propaganda against the French government, the EU, Muslims and also issued offensive slanderous communication against the FFII, the community that backs <no>OOXML and sided against Microsoft in its EU software patents lobby campaign. Here is what TechCentralStation was writing:

The group is waging an ideological continuation of Karl Marx’s crusade against capitalism and private property. The people who run FFII are enemies of private property, the free-market and capitalism. Why should Europeans let the FFII create a world in which innovators are exploited by pirates and plagiarizers? Rather, we should give Hartmut Pilch, the FFII president, the same advice as George Bush gave to Michael Moore in Fahrenheit 9/11: "Go get a real job!"

According to the Washingtonpost, DCI seems to be also involved in raising support for some astroturfing cause:

DCI's many clients over the years have included General Motors, Exxon Mobil, Verizon and Morgan Stanley, according to federal disclosure forms. The firm is expert in targeting voters and persuading them to contact their elected officials, a mechanism called grass-roots lobbying. But it has also lobbied lawmakers directly and has registered to lobby for a long list of clients at the federal level.

last edited on 1220553866|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by zoobab + show more
Re: McCain advised by software patent and tobacco lobbyists?
arebentiarebenti 1220553950|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

What do you expect from Tobacco and friends?

The problem in the US seems to be that these guys are nothing special while in Europe such communication is "slightly over the top" and useful to make fun of them.

last edited on 1220555903|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by arebenti + show more
new post